Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski have just caused a sensation by claiming, in effect, that they were extorted by Donald Trump and the National Enquirer. According to their op-ed in the Washington Post, White House staffers told them that the tabloid would run damaging stories about them unless they could persuade the President to intervene on their behalf. On their show Friday morning, Brzezinski elaborated, saying, “They were calling my children. They were calling close friends.” In response, Trump tweeted that Scarborough had asked him to stop an Enquirer story and that he, Trump, had refused. This all came a day after Trump’s crude Twitter attack on the “Morning Joe” co-hosts, who were recently engaged to be married. For its part, the Enquirer is portraying the dispute as one between the MSNBC duo and the President. In a statement provided to me, Dylan Howard, a top executive of American Media, Inc., the Enquirer’s parent company, said, “At the beginning of June we accurately reported a story that recounted the relationship between Joe Scarborough and Mika Brzezinski, the truth of which is not in dispute. At no time did we threaten either Joe or Mika or their children in connection with our reporting on the story. We have no knowledge of any discussions between the White House and Joe and Mika about our story, and absolutely no involvement in those discussions.”

To an outside observer used to a measure of sanity in journalistic and
political affairs, the whole exchange may sound surreal. But it is not
surprising to me. Earlier this week, the magazine published my profile
of David Pecker, the chief executive of American Media. Pecker is a proud and loyal friend of the President’s and, as he recounted to me,
has welcomed the opportunity to use his tabloids to advance Trump’s
personal and political interests.

Trump and Pecker met more than two decades ago, when Pecker, then the
president of Hachette, entered into a “custom publishing” venture with
Trump. This was, essentially, a Trump fanzine that Hachette published
and Trump distributed in his hotels and casinos. Over the subsequent
years, Pecker has continued to do Trump’s bidding, though he’s had no
formal business dealings with the developer turned politician. This was
especially true during 2016, when the Enquirer repeatedly savaged
Trump’s opponents (especially Hillary Clinton) and extolled Trump.

Pecker’s assistance to Trump went beyond merely giving good press. As I
recount in my piece, a woman named Karen McDougal, Playboy’s playmate
of the year in 1998, began shopping a story that she had an affair with
Trump after his marriage to Melania. Pecker swooped in and, according to
the Wall Street Journal, paid McDougal a hundred and fifty thousand
dollars, purportedly for writing fitness columns for Pecker’s other
magazines. In fact, as Pecker acknowledged to me, a condition of
McDougal’s hiring was that she not bash Trump or American Media.
Pecker’s explanation for this action was straightforward. He did it, he
said, because “the guy’s a personal friend of mine.”

Thus, it’s certainly possible that there was some connection between the
Enquirer story about Scarborough and Brzezinski and Trump’s quest for
favorable coverage from “Morning Joe.” Bizarrely enough, Trump’s most
recent tweet suggests that he served as the middleman between the
anchors and the magazine, though he denies that he did ultimately
intervene. What’s not in doubt, I think, is what Pecker would have done
if Trump had asked him to refrain from publishing. Pecker would have
followed Trump’s wishes. Pecker is not just a publisher. He regards
himself as a kind of father of the Trump Presidency. As Pecker told me,
“I’d tell him every time I’d see him. I’d say, ‘Who cares about governor
or mayor, you should be President. They love you. These people love
you.’ ”