• A New York Times op-ed calls for the public shaming of U.S. government employees working in migrant detention facilities 
• “These agents’ actions should be publicized, particularly in their home communities,” writes Kate Cronin-Furman
• Cronin-Furman insists that she is not calling for the “doxxing” of government workers, but she describes a scenario where a border protection agent is shamed at church after being filmed at a migrant facility

The New York Times published an op-ed on Saturday that calls for border protection agents to face “serious social costs” and public shaming over their work at facilities housing migrant children.

Click Here: bape jacket cheap

“The identities of the individual Customs and Border Protection agents who are physically separating children from their families and staffing the detention centers are not undiscoverable,” writes Kate Cronin-Furman, an assistant professor at University College London.

“Immigration lawyers have agent names; journalists reporting at the border have names, photos and even videos. These agents’ actions should be publicized, particularly in their home communities.”

In the article, Cronin-Furman proposes a public shaming campaign — which she insists is not the same as “doxxing” — in hopes of forcing border protection agents to quit their jobs. She also says that her proposal would deter others from taking jobs as border agents.

Tens of thousands of migrants from Central America flock to the border each month in hopes of obtaining asylum to enter the U.S. The influx has tested the limits of border facilities housing migrant children and families.

In the piece, Cronin-Furman envisions a scenario where a U.S. government employee who has been filmed at a migrant facility faces scrutiny at church from fellow congregants.

“The knowledge, for instance, that when you go to church on Sunday, your entire congregation will have seen you on TV ripping a child out of her father’s arms is a serious social cost to bear,” she writes, while insisting that she is not making “an argument for doxxing.”